The US-China engagement era has come to an end, says top US official
The US-China engagement era has come to an end, says top US official

The US-China engagement era has come to an end, says top US official

Kurt Campbell says that ‘competition’ in the future will be ‘the dominant paradigm’, and that working with allies will be the way forward.

Kurt Campbell says that ‘competition’ in the future will be ‘the dominant paradigm’, and that working with allies will be the way forward.

The more than three-decade-old era of US-China engagement, in which the world’s two largest economies developed close interdependent relations, “has come to an end”, a top official from the Biden administration has said.

“The period that was widely described as engagement has come to an end,” said Kurt Campbell, coordinator of Indo-Pacific Affairs and the top US official for Asia, at an event at Stanford University. He said that “competition” in the future would be “the dominant paradigm”, and US policy would operate under “a new set of strategic parameters”.
Bloomberg News quoted him for saying.

Sir. Campbell’s comments underscore the shift in U.S. views on China from the time of the Obama administration as well as the broadly divided consensus on the current direction of the relationship after four turbulent years for the relationship under the former Trump administration.

Working with allies is the way forward

Mr. Campbell said “Chinese politics under [President] Xi is largely responsible for the shift in US policy, ”
Bloomberg News reported, adding that he cited “clashes on China’s border with India, an economic campaign against Australia and the emergence of China ‘wolf war’ diplomacy” as examples suggesting that “China is determined to play a more confident role. ” Describing the Chinese president as “deeply ideological but also rather unsentimental”, he said the two Chinese top diplomats who had held talks with top officials in the Biden administration in Alaska in March – a member of the Politburo Yang Jiechi and Foreign Minister Wang Yi – were “not near, within a hundred miles” from Mr. Xi’s inner circle. He said the United States believed that “the best way to engage a more confident China is to work with allies, partners and friends.”

In response to his comments, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Thursday that “the use of ‘competition’ [to] Defining or dominating ties between China and the United States is a total mistake that will only lead to confrontation and conflict. “” Although there is competition, it should be healthy competition that helps reinforce each other and pursue common progress, rather than an evil one. competition to beat each other. China vehemently rejects US action to exclude and restrict China in the name of competition. “He added.

Quad criticized

Also on Thursday, the People’s Liberation Army senior colonel and spokesman for China’s defense minister, Tan Kefei, when asked about the US Indo-Pacific military strategy, slammed countries seeking to “establish selective and exclusive military alliances, to band together or create ‘New Cold War ‘with bloc confrontation,’ ‘comes amid growing Chinese criticism of the India-Australia-Japan-US Quad grouping.

“The strategy of intensifying military presence and highlighting military competition will only exacerbate regional tensions and jeopardize world peace and stability,” he said, adding that “the US side should not on the one hand claim to create new defense hotlines. [with China] while on the other hand continue to escalate military deployments in the Asian Pacific region, they often carry out closer reconnaissance of China and even deliberately initiate dangerous situations where planes and vessels almost collide. “

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.